Hassett expects inflation to gradually slow, stressing that
On November 6, 2026, Hassett, Director of the U.S. National Economic Council, said inflation should slow and that he will respect the judgment of Fed Chair Warsh and the Federal Reserve. Two sources are consistent on this statement; the PANews version additionally mentions that the AI bubble is worth worrying about, along with topics such as job growth and the Intel agreement.
Event Timeline
- [11-06 14:20] Hassett: Inflation should slow, and we will respect the judgment of Fed Chair Warsh and the Federal Reserve (Odaily)
- [11-06 14:21] Hassett: The AI bubble is indeed worth worrying about; respect the judgment of Warsh and the Federal Reserve (PANews)
Background and Impact
At 14:20 on November 6, 2026, Odaily reported that Hassett, Director of the U.S. National Economic Council, said inflation should slow and that we will respect the judgment of Fed Chair Warsh and the Federal Reserve, citing Jin10. One minute later, at 14:21, PANews published the same statement, with core wording consistent with the former.
The overlap between the two sources centers on inflation and the Federal Reserve relationship: Hassett expects inflation to slow and emphasizes respect for the judgment of Warsh and the Federal Reserve. The difference lies in the scope of information. The Odaily version presents only the above Fed-related statement; the PANews version also records that he said he is studying the rapid job growth of the past three months, that the AI bubble is indeed worth worrying about, that the economy is still expected to achieve strong growth even if growth in the data center sector slows, and that Trump is excited about the agreement reached with Intel and finds it gratifying to see Intel achieve a strong turnaround within a period of time. The two materials do not give contradictory numbers or conclusions on the same fact; the divergence is mainly a difference in the scope of coverage.
Based on the disclosed content, this set of statements touches on inflation, employment, the AI bubble and data center growth at the same time, and the information does not point in a single direction: on one side is the judgment that inflation should slow, and on the other is concern about the AI bubble, as well as the view that the economy is still expected to grow strongly even as data center growth slows. Because the materials do not provide specific policy decisions, timetables or data, it is impossible to judge the Federal Reserve's subsequent actions on this basis, nor can the above statements be equated with policy commitments. For crypto market readers, this event itself does not mention crypto assets or trading platforms; if one searches for Huobi HTX registration APP download, Zhima Gate.io registration APP download, Bitget registration APP download, Binance registration APP download, or OKX registration APP download, these have no direct relationship with this monetary policy statement.
Frequently Asked Questions
### What direct impact does this news have on the crypto market?
The materials show that Hassett's statements focused on inflation, employment, the AI bubble, data centers and the Intel agreement, and did not mention crypto assets, crypto trading platforms or specific monetary policy operations. Therefore, it is impossible to judge the direct impact on the crypto market from the available information.
### What points should be watched going forward?
Attention can be paid to follow-up data on what Hassett called the "rapid job growth of the past three months," and to whether inflation slows as he expected; the materials do not give the timing of Federal Reserve meetings, the policy path, or specific criteria for judging the AI bubble.
### How do the reports from the two sources differ?
Odaily presents only that inflation should slow and respect for the judgment of Warsh and the Federal Reserve; at the same time, PANews also reported content including job growth, concern about the AI bubble, data center growth and the Intel agreement. The core Federal Reserve statement is consistent; the difference is in the scope of coverage.