Strive raises SATA preferred stock annual dividend rate to 1
PANews and Odaily 星球日报 reported successively on November 12, 2026 that Strive raised the annual dividend rate on its perpetual preferred stock SATA to 13.25%, effective from December 1, while the fixed annual dividend rate on SATS remains at 15%. The reports also show that Strive currently holds approximately 43,153 BTC. Neither material explains the reason for the increase.
Event timeline
- [11-12 12:48] Strive raises the dividend rate on SATA preferred stock to 13.25% (PANews)
- [11-12 12:49] Strive raises the annual dividend rate on its SATA preferred stock to 13.25% (Odaily 星球日报)
Background and impact
On November 12, 2026, PANews (12:48) and Odaily 星球日报 (12:49) reported successively that Strive had raised the annual dividend rate on its perpetual preferred stock SATA to 13.25%, with the adjustment effective from December 1. Both sources also mentioned that the fixed annual dividend rate on SATS would remain at 15%. The two reports are fully consistent on the instrument names, the size of the adjustment, and the effective date, with no divergence in figures or wording.
In this disclosure, Strive also provided its Bitcoin holdings: approximately 43,153 BTC. According to the reports, SATA is perpetual preferred stock, and its annual dividend rate after the increase is 13.25%; the fixed annual dividend rate on SATS is 15% and remains unchanged this time. Neither material explains the specific reason for the increase, nor does it disclose the scale involved in the adjustment, funding source arrangements, or the impact on subsequent holdings. The reports contain no management statements or direct quotes from announcements. Therefore, within the scope of the available information, the only confirmed changes are the dividend rate figures and the effective date.
On the timeline, there is a window between the November 12 reports and the December 1 effective date, and this point is a direct reference for observing subsequent disclosures. The dividend rate difference of 13.25% for SATA and 15% for SATS constitutes concrete data that outsiders can check when understanding Strive’s preferred stock structure; as for whether this increase is accompanied by further actions on holdings or capital structure, the available materials provide no explanation, and any extended judgment lacks source support. It should be noted that PANews stated in its report that the news originated from Cointelegraph, while the Odaily 星球日报 report did not label the original source. The two are consistent in content but neither provides Strive’s original documents, so readers should rely on subsequent official announcements.
For readers who wish to independently check market data and announcements, common platform entry search terms include Sesame Gate.io registration APP download, Bitget registration APP download, Binance registration APP download, OKX registration APP download, and HTX registration APP download; this article only organizes the facts in the above public reports and does not constitute any investment advice.
FAQ
### When does the SATA dividend rate increase take effect?
It takes effect from December 1. Both PANews and Odaily 星球日报 reported this timing on November 12, 2026. The annual dividend rate after the increase is 13.25%, and the reports did not mention whether there is a transition period or other accompanying arrangements.
### What is the difference between the dividend rates on SATA and SATS?
According to the two materials, SATA is perpetual preferred stock, and its annual dividend rate after the increase is 13.25%; the fixed annual dividend rate on SATS is 15% and remains unchanged this time. The materials do not explain the reasons for the difference in dividend rates between the two, nor do they state the respective scale.
### Is this adjustment related to Strive’s Bitcoin holdings?
The materials only show that Strive currently holds approximately 43,153 BTC. They do not state that there is a connection between the dividend rate increase and the holdings, nor do they disclose the reason for the adjustment or the funding source, so it is impossible to determine the relationship between the two based on this.